6 Reasons Why The Undertaker Should Win At WWE SummerSlam

Part of the reasoning that Undertaker should beat Brock Lesnar at SummerSlam is that it makes way less sense for him to lose. WWE doesn't always do the most logical booking but I think they've built this match with only one possible ending.

Brock definitively beat Undertaker at their last encounter. Not only was The Streak halted dead in its tracks at the feet of The Beast, it was done so without any shred of controversy. Brock won as clean as he possibly could have.

If Undertaker came back just to lose to Brock at SummerSlam, then what was accomplished? Lesnar's dominance was proven at WrestleMania 30, do we really need reminded?

And if Undertaker loses, who does he fight next? Certainly not a main eventer. Back to back losses against Brock emphasizes that he no longer can hang in the main event.

Sure, there was a Bray Wyatt win sandwiched in between those bouts, but who hasn't beaten Bray Wyatt before? He's really popular but it's hard to look at his wins and losses and argue that he's too far above the mid-card.

Undertaker should win and face top talent like Seth Rollins and John Cena until his third encounter (in this series) with Brock Lesnar. A Lesnar win at SummerSlam will justify any losses he has in the time being.