Really, a lot of these arguments are facets of one grand, overarching misgiving many people have against Superman. He's boring. Especially when compared to the multi-faceted angst of Batman. If there's never any threat of him dying, then there's no conflict, so all of his stories must be pretty boring, right? Plus he's so nice - he's like a big blue boy scout. Well, that's a matter of opinion, obviously. But really, how is Superman's struggle any different to Batman's? Both are orphaned, both struggle to make a difference with their powers whilst not going overboard - it's just that, in the case of the Man of Steel, he's always making sure he doesn't lose his humanity and become a despotic god. His supporting cast is not quite as capable of looking after itself as the extended Bat-Family, and so a lot of the conflict is found in keeping others safe whilst also saving the day. Nihilism and cynicism is cheap and easy, leading to the likes of the Frank Miller Batman, unencumbered by morals so he can go break The Joker's neck. Superman - who wields absolute power, but manages not to be corrupted by it; who always tries to do the right thing even when it isn't easy or even the smart move; who tries to be better than human - is clearly more interesting. What other common misconceptions do people have about Superman? Share any more down in the comments.
Tom Baker is the Comics Editor at WhatCulture! He's heard all the Doctor Who jokes, but not many about Randall and Hopkirk. He also blogs at http://communibearsilostate.wordpress.com/
