10 Legitimate Criticisms Of The Dark Knight Rises

2. Bruce Learns A Key Bit Of True Exposition From A Vision

Ras With sights set on rounding off the trilogy, Nolan made a smart move in bringing back Liam Neeson to play Ra€™s Al Ghul; it gave the whole League Of Shadow€™s plot some legitimacy that wouldn't have been attained with just lip service to the character. With Scarecrow alive, Joker respectfully retired and Harvey Dent directly tied in to (some of) the film€™s set up, Ra€™s was the hardest to deal with. He€™s such a presence in the plot and yet showing any footage of him in a new flashback would feel forced. A pain/dehydration induced vision, however, surprisingly works. Except that it€™s not only used to pay tribute to the character, but deliver a key plot point too. Bruce has already heard the story of the mercenary€™s child and wrongly assumed it was Bane. Now he€™s having visions of long dead people who tell him true exposition out of the blue; the child may not be Bane€™s, but it certainly is certainly an Al Ghul. There€™s no other way Bruce could have heard this (if the doctor said it, why not show it) and yet he takes this vision (including Ra€™s non-plussed response that Bane is his son) as truth.
Contributor
Contributor

Film Editor (2014-2016). Loves The Usual Suspects. Hates Transformers 2. Everything else lies somewhere in the middle. Once met the Chuckle Brothers.