10 Major Flaws With WWE's Current Pay-Per-View Model

3. Lame Go-Home Shows

Jinder Mahal WWE title
WWE.com

Pay-per-view go-home shows used to be among the most enjoyable weekly TV episodes on WWE’s calendar. When buyrates were still relevant, the company would go all-out to sell the PPV with two/three hours of exciting, all-action television. They didn’t always succeed, but when they did, the shows were often exciting enough to convince fans to buy the PPV on their own.

The advent of the WWE Network has changed this. There’s no longer an incentive to build towards conclusive PPV outcomes, as the company don’t need to worry about buyrates anymore. They already have your Network subscription fee, and can therefore do as they please on the go-home show.

This has resulted in little differentiation between the last pre-PPV stop and any other episode of Raw and SmackDown. WWE know they can get away with mailing it in, so why would they do anything else? This isn’t a huge loss, but it has resulted in the dilution of WWE’s PPV cycle as a whole. Go-home shows are now entirely meaningless, and this isn’t something that’s going to change any time in the near future.

Channel Manager
Channel Manager

Andy has been with WhatCulture for eight years and is currently WhatCulture's Wrestling Channel Manager. A writer, presenter, and editor with 10+ years of experience in online media, he has been a sponge for all wrestling knowledge since playing an old Royal Rumble 1992 VHS to ruin in his childhood. Having previously worked for Bleacher Report, Andy specialises in short and long-form writing, video presenting, voiceover acting, and editing, all characterised by expert wrestling knowledge and commentary. Andy is as much a fan of 1985 Jim Crockett Promotions as he is present-day AEW and WWE - just don't make him choose between the two.