10 Wrestling Legal Battles That Turned Ugly
7. WWF Vs. WWF
Protracted legal wrangling between World Wrestling Entertainment and the World Wide Fund for Nature (aka the World Wildlife Fund) forced Vince McMahon to change the name of his entire organisation after crudely neglecting to follow clear guidelines set out in a 1994 legal agreement over the shared initials.
McMahon promised to restrict use of the branding in business activities, then robustly went back on his word in liberally using 'WWF' alongside 'World Wrestling Federation' in every aspect of his presentation for the following eight years.
It became merely a matter of time before the breaches caught up with him, and the company's rampant success during the Attitude Era was enough for the animal charity to draw a line under the constant brand confusion.
A comprehensive victory forced McMahon's $35million rebrand in 2002, and hijacked countless hours of footage with jarring blurs and laughable dialogue censors. A follow up settlement in 2012 thankfully reversed that element of the 2002 case, allowing WWE to air any archive footage completely unedited.
Not only did it strip away the eyesore, but the decision rendered what would become the WWE Network a much more serviceable concept.