The WORST Wrestling Story Every Year (1989-2025)
1994 - Doink Vs. Jerry Lawler
How did the WWF book this and the Bret Vs. Owen Hart feud in the same year?
Bret Vs. Owen was a masterclass - incredibly sophisticated by Vince McMahon’s standards (naturally, Vince had to be persuaded by Bret and Bruce Prichard that brothers do in fact fight). It was the most believable conflict in WWE to that point, and perhaps ever; Owen had a right to feel held down, because Bret could have just tagged him at Royal Rumble 1994, but Bret had a right to protect his younger brother because he truly loved him and boasted significantly more big match experience.
God, the frisson of it all, the exquisite technicality boiling over at WrestleMania. It was amazing.
Jerry Lawler Vs. Doink, conversely, was the least sophisticated material of the year. Doink was by this point a terrible, shoot babyface clown, removed entirely from the brilliantly unsettling sad sack loser portrayed by Matt Borne. This was an embarrassing, brutally unfunny prank-based storyline. You were meant to point and laugh at Lawler getting a taste of his own medicine, for his roast comedy insults, but there was no relief because Doink was a preschool kids’ TV show character. Their only value is in hypnotising a restless child and granting an exhausted parent a moment’s rest. Doink, looking at WWF business, couldn’t even do that.
This led to a terrible match, a Worst of the Decade contender, at Survivor Series 1994 - in which the side-splitting punchline was watching little people get tripped over.
The Undertaker Vs. Undertaker feud was dire, but this was produced for three year-olds.