5. Natalya
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B7JTVGbf5rw My current favorite diva in WWE is Natalya. In my opinion, she's the best in-ring performer among the women in the company. She's also the current diva with the most experience on the roster. They like to use her as a mentor to the other girls, which is smart, but she's also somebody that can be doing more too. When Natalya was feuding with AJ, the fans really got behind her. Her Sharpshooter is one of the most popular moves that any woman does and always gets a good reaction. It's a shame that her feud with AJ ended so quickly and without her getting back the Divas Title that she hasn't held for about four years. Much like Naomi, she's also on Total Divas and her relationship with her husband Tyson Kidd is heavily featured on there. When they're on WWE TV, though, they're not seen together. Then again Tyson is barely on TV anyway and that's a mistake too. What Natalya should be doing is standing up for the other girls as a leader of the divas division, as somebody that speaks up for them and uses her wrestling skills to bring pain to the other girls. I wouldn't mind a heel turn for her, but it seems like WWE is content to use her as a babyface. That's fine. Just give her a chance to be more than "third generation wrestler" girl that smiles all the time and make her into her own woman. If Natalya was given a chance to speak about how AJ Lee hides behind Tamina and couldn't beat her one on one the fans would be behind it. Why? Because it's true. It benefits everybody if somebody speaks up. She should be the one that beats AJ for the Divas Title too. What WWE should want is to push the most experience diva they have because they know she can deliver on the big stage. She's proved it time and time again. Just give her an opportunity.
John Canton
Contributor
John wrote at WhatCulture from December 2013 to December 2015. It was fun, but it's over for now. Follow him on Twitter @johnreport. You can also send an email to mrjohncanton@gmail.com with any questions or comments as well.
See more from
John