6. The Government Consider Him Less Dangerous Than Batman
When you look at the Batman V Superman: Dawn Of Justice and Suicide Sqaud trailers side by side, a weird inconsistency comes to light: the public are being encouraged by the press (including the Gotham media, and Clark Kents reporting) not to trust Batman, while the government are more than happy to hand responsibility and important missions to members of his rogues gallery like Deadshot and Harley Quinn. Whats all that about? One theory doing the rounds is that the government actually consider most villains the Joker included less dangerous than Batman. Although these baddies dont have clean criminal records, they can easily be controlled with the threat of death and the promise of reduced prison sentences/big piles of cash. Maybe Letos Joker no-matter how unhinged he is - will be made a member of the Squad at one stage, as a less-dangerous alternative to employing the services of Batman or Superman. Superman levelled Metropolis in Man Of Steel, while Batmans brutal brand of justice isnt what the government want to be seen supporting. By comparison, redeemed criminals fighting to save society could be seen as a better PR angle. If this one turns out to be true, itll certainly be interesting to see how Batman responds to the news that the government trust him less than Joker. Surely, he'd see it as a sizeable kick in the teeth for The Caped Crusader.