The Disturbing Truth Behind A CM Punk In-Ring Return
2) WWE ignores this, and the very core of Punk’s character and journey, and instead maps a story, involving somebody like a Seth Rollins, built around who really is the ‘Best’, in the same way WWE builds most programmes around two technical wrestlers. From 2012, to 2019 (Rollins Vs. AJ Styles), that’s the WWE approach.
There’s always a third option, of course: WWE botches whatever it is, in the time-honoured tradition. Any notion of a heel sell-out character is untenable: nobody will boo CM Punk.
The disturbing truth behind his inevitable return to the ring is that which made Punk so special then feels empty now. That rhetoric was impeccably delivered, but that's all it was: rhetoric.
Again: those fans don’t chant “CM Punk!” for nothing. He is adored, and perhaps he wasn’t just a beneficiary of the barren era in which he starred. But if there is an adaptable, enduring genius underneath that mythical exterior, WWE wouldn’t know what to do with it.
How could WWE possibly botch CM Punk's return?
The subject of that sentence is irrelevant, no matter how popular or over that talent is. That’s the prevailing story of 2019. Not to be too dramatic, but it’s the prevailing story of Vince McMahon’s twilight years.
How could WWE possibly botch the Summer of Punk?