From @tallarido31: When The Shield splits, excluding Roman Reigns, who will be a bigger star Dean Ambrose or Seth Rollins?
It's hard to know for sure what WWE has in mind because I really think all three guys have the skills to become main event performers if the company really gets behind them. What Dean Ambrose brings to the table are great microphone skills, facial expressions that make him stand out (reminds me of William Regal in that way) and he's a very good in-ring performer as well. He's had plenty of great matches both as a team as well as when he's had singles matches. Rollins has been a really good wrestler since he was in his early 20s in Ring of Honor. Now he's more developed in his late 20s after a couple years in WWE developmental and he's showing how good he is on the main roster. He might be lacking a bit on the microphone, but I don't think he's bad at all. It's just that Ambrose is a better talker. In ring, I think Rollins is the best of the group and top five in all of WWE. Both guys will hopefully be main eventers, but I think Ambrose will get a chance first just because he's better on the microphone right now and that goes a long way.
John wrote at WhatCulture from December 2013 to December 2015. It was fun, but it's over for now. Follow him on Twitter @johnreport. You can also send an email to mrjohncanton@gmail.com with any questions or comments as well.
