Every WWE 2K17 Superstar Rating Revealed & Ranked Worst To Best

55. Bayley

Rating: 86

Last Year's Rating: N/A

Likewise an impressive debut number for Bayley, whose absence last year alongside the Horsewomen was a particular bone of contention for 2K fans. Given her main roster appearances - and her popularity - 86 is a good move by 2K. Not that it's empty appeasement, of course.

Great likeness too.

54. Rusev

Rating: 86

Last Year's Rating: 88

Rusev took a leaf out of Bret Hart's book by publicly bemoaning his rating - he's not wrong, by the way: considering how high Big Show's rating was last year, he should be at the same level as he was last year or higher again. But then, this isn't last year and everyone's taken a hit.

He should think himself lucky it wasn't lower.

53. Arn Anderson

Rating: 86

Last Year's Rating:

A return to the main roster for last year's DLC inclusion sees him ranked at a respectable 86. Rusev might not be happy with his rating, but if he thinks about being classed the same as Anderson, the context makes it a lot easier to take.

52. Shinsuke Nakamura

Rating: 86

Last Year's Rating: N/A

The NXT DLC inclusion should probably have been rated the same as Samoa Joe this time out, but we should just be happy to have him included at all. Even with that rat's nest hair.

51. Booker T

Rating: 87

Last Year's Rating: 89

What has Booker T done in the last year to lose two points? Maybe it comes down to him retiring this year and this being settled on as his legend rating going forward?